Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here We Go Again, another school shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MCVetSteve" data-source="post: 3116616" data-attributes="member: 33591"><p>I’m not sure what the solution is. One thing I am certain of is that the answer to this problem lies in the “more freedom” category, and not the “less freedom.” If that “more freedom” category happens to include harsher punishments, so be it. Then again, I have often advocated for this even on things as simple as drunk driving. I think it should not be illegal, if you get caught, you go to jail until you’re able to drive. You pay for the tow and impound, yes even if you can arrange for someone to get it immediately. After you’re sober, that’s it, you’re released, and you get your stuff back as soon as you can pay for all the services required to take of your stupid drunk a**. <strong>However</strong>, if you damage someone’s property, or hurt them you are also <strong>100% liable for all damages incurred, </strong>not your insurance company. If someone is killed due to your drunk driving, you’re 100% liable for that also, at the expense of your own life. I dunno, I just like the “more freedom and harsher punishments” idea. Imagine how serious people would get about drunk driving the first time someone was executed...?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MCVetSteve, post: 3116616, member: 33591"] I’m not sure what the solution is. One thing I am certain of is that the answer to this problem lies in the “more freedom” category, and not the “less freedom.” If that “more freedom” category happens to include harsher punishments, so be it. Then again, I have often advocated for this even on things as simple as drunk driving. I think it should not be illegal, if you get caught, you go to jail until you’re able to drive. You pay for the tow and impound, yes even if you can arrange for someone to get it immediately. After you’re sober, that’s it, you’re released, and you get your stuff back as soon as you can pay for all the services required to take of your stupid drunk a**. [B]However[/B], if you damage someone’s property, or hurt them you are also [B]100% liable for all damages incurred, [/B]not your insurance company. If someone is killed due to your drunk driving, you’re 100% liable for that also, at the expense of your own life. I dunno, I just like the “more freedom and harsher punishments” idea. Imagine how serious people would get about drunk driving the first time someone was executed...? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here We Go Again, another school shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom