Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wawazat" data-source="post: 3910360" data-attributes="member: 35603"><p>I definitely don't know what the right answer is for this specific situation. After seeing some completely nonsensical responses to well documented police processes over the past several years, I certainly understand the concern. Would the application of the 1A in this scenario have a similar boundary as inciting a riot with speech? If someone livestreams an interaction with law enforcement that then causes a public disruption, could that person be accused of inciting civil unrest of some sort?</p><p></p><p>I have always struggled with the dissonance between what is moral/ethical and what is legal. My views on what is moral and acceptable behavior is far beyond what I would ever want to see put on the books as law. I think someone stopping to record what may be someone's most devastating day of their life just to get some likes on social media is pretty despicable. I do not like to think about how a law trying to curb that action could become egregiously abused and ultimately really erode some core freedoms in this country.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wawazat, post: 3910360, member: 35603"] I definitely don't know what the right answer is for this specific situation. After seeing some completely nonsensical responses to well documented police processes over the past several years, I certainly understand the concern. Would the application of the 1A in this scenario have a similar boundary as inciting a riot with speech? If someone livestreams an interaction with law enforcement that then causes a public disruption, could that person be accused of inciting civil unrest of some sort? I have always struggled with the dissonance between what is moral/ethical and what is legal. My views on what is moral and acceptable behavior is far beyond what I would ever want to see put on the books as law. I think someone stopping to record what may be someone's most devastating day of their life just to get some likes on social media is pretty despicable. I do not like to think about how a law trying to curb that action could become egregiously abused and ultimately really erode some core freedoms in this country. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom