Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TedKennedy" data-source="post: 3910580" data-attributes="member: 25419"><p>Wasting your breath, Terry. </p><p></p><p>It's become abundantly clear that some folks absolutely don't want video evidence that cannot be suppressed. </p><p></p><p>Reminds me of the groups that fought making bodycams required, and the groups that fought making bodycam footage public. </p><p></p><p>Oddly, it's the same bunch that fought to retain forfeiture asset laws.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TedKennedy, post: 3910580, member: 25419"] Wasting your breath, Terry. It's become abundantly clear that some folks absolutely don't want video evidence that cannot be suppressed. Reminds me of the groups that fought making bodycams required, and the groups that fought making bodycam footage public. Oddly, it's the same bunch that fought to retain forfeiture asset laws. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom