Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Johnny" data-source="post: 3911007" data-attributes="member: 14057"><p>Well it was spoken by a self proclaimed idiot.</p><p></p><p>But the intent of the statement was that if your pulling someone over to harass them needlessly or just for shits and giggles because you can. So much so, that the passenger in the car live streaming the harassment causes the situation to be unsafe. Maybe you should not have pulled them over.</p><p></p><p>Well it was spoken by a self proclaimed idiot. </p><p></p><p>But the intent of the statement was that if your pulling someone over to harass them needlessly or just for shits and giggles because you can. So much so, that the passenger in the car live streaming the encounter causes the situation to be unsafe for the officer. Maybe the officer should not have pulled them over in the first place. </p><p></p><p>Maybe it still sounds retarded. IDK. I have had more good interactions with cops than I have bad ones. But the bad ones were because the cop was a dick on a power trip and we were young and he could get away with it. </p><p></p><p>It doesn’t matter which amendments they start re-writing to remove our rights in bulk. But if we give up that minuscule level of freedom for someone’s perceived safety. It will snowball. After the first is the second. Which is some that that nobody on this board wants trampled on. The first large scale freedom grab in my lifetime was post 9/11. Now you have to get a full body scan and groped to ride on a flying school bus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Johnny, post: 3911007, member: 14057"] Well it was spoken by a self proclaimed idiot. But the intent of the statement was that if your pulling someone over to harass them needlessly or just for shits and giggles because you can. So much so, that the passenger in the car live streaming the harassment causes the situation to be unsafe. Maybe you should not have pulled them over. Well it was spoken by a self proclaimed idiot. But the intent of the statement was that if your pulling someone over to harass them needlessly or just for shits and giggles because you can. So much so, that the passenger in the car live streaming the encounter causes the situation to be unsafe for the officer. Maybe the officer should not have pulled them over in the first place. Maybe it still sounds retarded. IDK. I have had more good interactions with cops than I have bad ones. But the bad ones were because the cop was a dick on a power trip and we were young and he could get away with it. It doesn’t matter which amendments they start re-writing to remove our rights in bulk. But if we give up that minuscule level of freedom for someone’s perceived safety. It will snowball. After the first is the second. Which is some that that nobody on this board wants trampled on. The first large scale freedom grab in my lifetime was post 9/11. Now you have to get a full body scan and groped to ride on a flying school bus. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom