Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OK Corgi Rancher" data-source="post: 3911030" data-attributes="member: 45773"><p>OK. I can agree with that. I was trying to point out that one statement wasn't well thought out. That's it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I agree with this, too. As a matter of fact I pretty much agree with all that you've written aside from the one statement.</p><p></p><p>Having said that, this is still a complicated issue with many opportunities for unintended consequences if the resolution isn't done in a well thought out way.</p><p></p><p>My first inclination is if the behavior of the person recording the encounter does so peacefully and without interfering with the officer's business, no problem. If it rises to the level of obstruction or interference with the officer(s) they should be arrested and charged. And so often we see people doing that. They seem to think their camera/phone affords them some super power that prevents them from having to follow the law. That and screaming. I have no idea why people think screaming will get them what they want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OK Corgi Rancher, post: 3911030, member: 45773"] OK. I can agree with that. I was trying to point out that one statement wasn't well thought out. That's it. And I agree with this, too. As a matter of fact I pretty much agree with all that you've written aside from the one statement. Having said that, this is still a complicated issue with many opportunities for unintended consequences if the resolution isn't done in a well thought out way. My first inclination is if the behavior of the person recording the encounter does so peacefully and without interfering with the officer's business, no problem. If it rises to the level of obstruction or interference with the officer(s) they should be arrested and charged. And so often we see people doing that. They seem to think their camera/phone affords them some super power that prevents them from having to follow the law. That and screaming. I have no idea why people think screaming will get them what they want. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom