Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3911200" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>this is also completely asinine because MANY people have been literally swatted by, during, and because of livestreaming.</p><p></p><p>absolutely none of the people that got swatted, WHILE livestreaming, got a mob of people to show up and endanger the officers or interfere with their work. that's completely retarded and you know it.</p><p></p><p>and that's a perfect example for my justification because in all of those cases, the swatting is done incorrectly and unjustifiably ; there's simply no need for the police to be there in the first place because someone merely lied to them and they believed it. get this *that's the sole reason why people do it because they want to see if they can get police to just straight up kill and/or severely injure and/or kidnap the person livestreaming because police are so dumb they will just show up and do this without any recourse.*</p><p></p><p>if they actually checked the livestream *first* they would know the truth. retarded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3911200, member: 45524"] this is also completely asinine because MANY people have been literally swatted by, during, and because of livestreaming. absolutely none of the people that got swatted, WHILE livestreaming, got a mob of people to show up and endanger the officers or interfere with their work. that's completely retarded and you know it. and that's a perfect example for my justification because in all of those cases, the swatting is done incorrectly and unjustifiably ; there's simply no need for the police to be there in the first place because someone merely lied to them and they believed it. get this *that's the sole reason why people do it because they want to see if they can get police to just straight up kill and/or severely injure and/or kidnap the person livestreaming because police are so dumb they will just show up and do this without any recourse.* if they actually checked the livestream *first* they would know the truth. retarded. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom