Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3911312" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>i would say putting out fires is a firefighters job.</p><p></p><p>killing people isn't a police officers. in most cases where a police officer shoots someone, it would be legal for a citizen. like your hostage situation, would anyone convict the guy who shoots someone holding someone hostage?</p><p></p><p>it doesn't ignore context of 73 dead cops against 1,140 dead citizens and if we need more laws for safety of officers, even in situation with ZERO real world evidence to suggest it's needed (still haven't provided an example of someone livestreaming leading to violence against police, meanwhile i've addressed hundreds of swatting cases during livestreaming, all of them erroneous and all targeting people completely innocent), versus more laws for the safety of people AGAINST police.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3911312, member: 45524"] i would say putting out fires is a firefighters job. killing people isn't a police officers. in most cases where a police officer shoots someone, it would be legal for a citizen. like your hostage situation, would anyone convict the guy who shoots someone holding someone hostage? it doesn't ignore context of 73 dead cops against 1,140 dead citizens and if we need more laws for safety of officers, even in situation with ZERO real world evidence to suggest it's needed (still haven't provided an example of someone livestreaming leading to violence against police, meanwhile i've addressed hundreds of swatting cases during livestreaming, all of them erroneous and all targeting people completely innocent), versus more laws for the safety of people AGAINST police. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom