Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3911327" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>well again, objectively you don't attribute fault to anyone or anything; you just look at who killed who.</p><p></p><p>and yes, i mean i do blame police. the case i linked sounds like someone just murdered that guy and he happened to be a police officer. again, if he WASN'T a police officer, he was a citizen, and he shot a man who just stepped out of house, wouldn't he be guilty?</p><p></p><p>against your hostage situation (all purely conjecture btw) wherein a citizen would be justified in that shooting, just like a cop?</p><p></p><p>basically, i don't think police should have ANY extra judicial rights to use any more force than a normal citizen.</p><p></p><p>*in fact* i think police should have LESS rights to use violence. in that world, 12 year olds pissed off about call of duty wouldn't be able to literally dial a murder gang. how do you not understand this.</p><p></p><p>that kid couldn't have killed that guy *any other way* than using a called in hit squad. the existence of the hit squad being willing to kill anyone without question due to having legal protection is my issue.</p><p></p><p>so....yes?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3911327, member: 45524"] well again, objectively you don't attribute fault to anyone or anything; you just look at who killed who. and yes, i mean i do blame police. the case i linked sounds like someone just murdered that guy and he happened to be a police officer. again, if he WASN'T a police officer, he was a citizen, and he shot a man who just stepped out of house, wouldn't he be guilty? against your hostage situation (all purely conjecture btw) wherein a citizen would be justified in that shooting, just like a cop? basically, i don't think police should have ANY extra judicial rights to use any more force than a normal citizen. *in fact* i think police should have LESS rights to use violence. in that world, 12 year olds pissed off about call of duty wouldn't be able to literally dial a murder gang. how do you not understand this. that kid couldn't have killed that guy *any other way* than using a called in hit squad. the existence of the hit squad being willing to kill anyone without question due to having legal protection is my issue. so....yes? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom