Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3911366" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>yeah i've typed several novels worth of words on my old accounts on here on the use of force continuum, how they aren't always equal across police departments, how it's still based on a judgement call (like all interactions at the end of the day, how they lead to escalation of force instead of de-escalation, etc, but when you give someone the benefit of the doubt that they will have qualified immunity, they are going to be more likely to fire imo).</p><p></p><p>again, i don't hate police and i understand their job is basically impossible, but that's part of my complaint. they aren't asked to the right thing imo to enforce the law, only react to what they think violates it. that's not enforcement.</p><p></p><p>they should be a show of force. i would rather have armed police on most corners that won't fire unless someone is shooting at them, instead of police that show up without any information and just blast the first person they think might be a threat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3911366, member: 45524"] yeah i've typed several novels worth of words on my old accounts on here on the use of force continuum, how they aren't always equal across police departments, how it's still based on a judgement call (like all interactions at the end of the day, how they lead to escalation of force instead of de-escalation, etc, but when you give someone the benefit of the doubt that they will have qualified immunity, they are going to be more likely to fire imo). again, i don't hate police and i understand their job is basically impossible, but that's part of my complaint. they aren't asked to the right thing imo to enforce the law, only react to what they think violates it. that's not enforcement. they should be a show of force. i would rather have armed police on most corners that won't fire unless someone is shooting at them, instead of police that show up without any information and just blast the first person they think might be a threat. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's Another Interesting Case Concerning the First Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom