Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder Is At It Again! :(
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ignerntbend" data-source="post: 2662357" data-attributes="member: 6981"><p>Holder's decision was to take the death penalty off the table for four of the six subjects, according to the second link in the OP. I don't know if its a good source or a bad source. I don't know if it's true or false. The article CLAIMS that Holder took the death penalty off the table for four of the six subjects. If none of the six will face the death penalty the article does not link that to a decision by Holder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ignerntbend, post: 2662357, member: 6981"] Holder's decision was to take the death penalty off the table for four of the six subjects, according to the second link in the OP. I don't know if its a good source or a bad source. I don't know if it's true or false. The article CLAIMS that Holder took the death penalty off the table for four of the six subjects. If none of the six will face the death penalty the article does not link that to a decision by Holder. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder Is At It Again! :(
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom