Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Foghorn" data-source="post: 2740264" data-attributes="member: 8834"><p>That's always been the case absent "reasonable articulated suspicion". In the case referenced the officer did not have RAS but decided to detain the driver. The courts have always said you can detain with RAS, this idiot decided to detain without it and the courts slammed him for it.</p><p>Nothing changed except the courts said don't do this. You can and will be detained if the officer has RAS. </p><p></p><p>People keep rejoicing like this some major victory for freedom, but it's simply the courts clarifying what should have already been clear. And to most LEO'S it was.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing screams poor craftsmanship like wrinkles in your duct tape</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Foghorn, post: 2740264, member: 8834"] That's always been the case absent "reasonable articulated suspicion". In the case referenced the officer did not have RAS but decided to detain the driver. The courts have always said you can detain with RAS, this idiot decided to detain without it and the courts slammed him for it. Nothing changed except the courts said don't do this. You can and will be detained if the officer has RAS. People keep rejoicing like this some major victory for freedom, but it's simply the courts clarifying what should have already been clear. And to most LEO'S it was. Nothing screams poor craftsmanship like wrinkles in your duct tape [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom