Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 2883336" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>sure wonder how above electronic asset seizure can be controlled? who gave OHP blessing to be able to do above?</p><p>who needs to be contacted to voice our displeasure?</p><p></p><p>surely OHP didn't decide electronic cash seizure policy by itself???</p><p>with no oversight except consulting with their attorneys ...</p><p></p><p>electronic cash seizure means if they find a check with your account info, that would be enough to wipe out your bank account with little more than the uber low bar of suspicion of wrong doing. someone could easily not remember their exact checking account balance and/or other details when questioned under duress. answering wrong could be the basis for seizure of your entire cash balance.</p><p></p><p>once all your cash are seized, you've got no funds to hire an attorney, which then could costs as much as the funds being recovered, on top of a legal fight that could take years. even if you do eventually get your funds back.</p><p></p><p>there is NO way this should be allowed to stand!!! funds should NOT be allowed to be seized unless someone is convicted of a crime.</p><p></p><p>what I don't understand is how cash seizure with NO charges/crime committed could possibly be allowed under our constitution???</p><p></p><p>this 100% goes against our constitutional right of being innocent until proven guilty!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 2883336, member: 7629"] sure wonder how above electronic asset seizure can be controlled? who gave OHP blessing to be able to do above? who needs to be contacted to voice our displeasure? surely OHP didn't decide electronic cash seizure policy by itself??? with no oversight except consulting with their attorneys ... electronic cash seizure means if they find a check with your account info, that would be enough to wipe out your bank account with little more than the uber low bar of suspicion of wrong doing. someone could easily not remember their exact checking account balance and/or other details when questioned under duress. answering wrong could be the basis for seizure of your entire cash balance. once all your cash are seized, you've got no funds to hire an attorney, which then could costs as much as the funds being recovered, on top of a legal fight that could take years. even if you do eventually get your funds back. there is NO way this should be allowed to stand!!! funds should NOT be allowed to be seized unless someone is convicted of a crime. what I don't understand is how cash seizure with NO charges/crime committed could possibly be allowed under our constitution??? this 100% goes against our constitutional right of being innocent until proven guilty!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom