Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Foghorn" data-source="post: 2884077" data-attributes="member: 8834"><p>Ok, now I understand better. Thanks..</p><p></p><p>While Loveless's figures are probably accurate the 99% he's referring to are not roadside siezures like I have been involved in. They are most likely tied to ongoing investigations ie, cops made a buy, or stopped the person on the way to a pre-arranged buy/sale ect. </p><p>This is what I was talking about earlier with his figures. I don't believe it's proper to lump those types of siezures in with interdiction type roadside siezures. They are a different animal all together.</p><p>Frankly 1200 bucks isn't worth my time roadside to do all the paperwork, nor do I know anyone else who does what I do who would waste thier time on it. It'd be like going elephant hunting and shooting mice.</p><p></p><p>I'd honestly like to see the breakdown of the stats for only highway interdiction in oklahoma. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Foghorn, post: 2884077, member: 8834"] Ok, now I understand better. Thanks.. While Loveless's figures are probably accurate the 99% he's referring to are not roadside siezures like I have been involved in. They are most likely tied to ongoing investigations ie, cops made a buy, or stopped the person on the way to a pre-arranged buy/sale ect. This is what I was talking about earlier with his figures. I don't believe it's proper to lump those types of siezures in with interdiction type roadside siezures. They are a different animal all together. Frankly 1200 bucks isn't worth my time roadside to do all the paperwork, nor do I know anyone else who does what I do who would waste thier time on it. It'd be like going elephant hunting and shooting mice. I'd honestly like to see the breakdown of the stats for only highway interdiction in oklahoma. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom