Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How did these thousands of Haitians get to Mexico?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3640824" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>riddle me this: how to immigrants improve the nations they invade, but not their own? </p><p></p><p>to me you have it like this: you have first world people who know how to live in a functioning, lawful society that uses technology as a basis for advancement. </p><p>you also have third world people who God bless them simply don't understand some of the things we take for granted. </p><p>so what makes more sense? taking the people from the first world nations and emigrating them to the third world, so that they can use their knowledge on things like technology and advancement for the greater good? </p><p></p><p>or taking people from the third world and invading the first, bringing in people who don't even speak the language, don't understand the laws, and will blatantly disobey them anyway because i mean they are invading the nation illegally. </p><p></p><p>to me the mission trip style emigration makes much, much more sense than marching hordes of immigrants into the first world and then just dumping them there to scrub toilets and pick fruit for the elite.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3640824, member: 45524"] riddle me this: how to immigrants improve the nations they invade, but not their own? to me you have it like this: you have first world people who know how to live in a functioning, lawful society that uses technology as a basis for advancement. you also have third world people who God bless them simply don't understand some of the things we take for granted. so what makes more sense? taking the people from the first world nations and emigrating them to the third world, so that they can use their knowledge on things like technology and advancement for the greater good? or taking people from the third world and invading the first, bringing in people who don't even speak the language, don't understand the laws, and will blatantly disobey them anyway because i mean they are invading the nation illegally. to me the mission trip style emigration makes much, much more sense than marching hordes of immigrants into the first world and then just dumping them there to scrub toilets and pick fruit for the elite. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How did these thousands of Haitians get to Mexico?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom