Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
I Nearly Lost It On FaceBook.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RickN" data-source="post: 2175377" data-attributes="member: 8854"><p>No I am saying that the residents of Watertown were under immediate threat. The terrorist could have forced his way into any of those homes and been holding the people hostage at gun point or with a bomb. The police had no way of knowing, no way of getting a warrant for a specific home since they did not know where he was, and probable did not know what he looked like for sure.</p><p></p><p>For all you guys know, a judge could have signed off on the methods they used.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RickN, post: 2175377, member: 8854"] No I am saying that the residents of Watertown were under immediate threat. The terrorist could have forced his way into any of those homes and been holding the people hostage at gun point or with a bomb. The police had no way of knowing, no way of getting a warrant for a specific home since they did not know where he was, and probable did not know what he looked like for sure. For all you guys know, a judge could have signed off on the methods they used. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
I Nearly Lost It On FaceBook.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom