Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
I Nearly Lost It On FaceBook.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sparky2" data-source="post: 2175392" data-attributes="member: 15464"><p>You voted for change didn't you?</p><p></p><p>LOL... I kid... I kid. No sense in a personal offensive remark like that.</p><p></p><p>I just don't get your train of thought at all. As said above, How does a judge overpower the 4th?</p><p></p><p>What part of this isn't OK to you (since you acknowledged that a lawsuit may be prudent)?</p><p></p><p>Will you argue that those people (atleast some) weren't forced out of their homes at gunpoint?</p><p></p><p>Will you then argue that this doesn't mean they had no choice?</p><p></p><p>Doesn't that mean then, that something had to be wrong? Think about it. With all the definitions of this incident's terms above, where do you not see that probable cause is needed for an individual's rights to be suspended? And if you have no arguments so far.... then where was the probable cause for each individual (since this is after all about an individual's rights)?</p><p></p><p></p><p>They were dead wrong here just as they were in the katrina incident. </p><p></p><p>We aren't busting in mud huts looking for persons of interest here, but that's where we are headed if this crap is allowed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sparky2, post: 2175392, member: 15464"] You voted for change didn't you? LOL... I kid... I kid. No sense in a personal offensive remark like that. I just don't get your train of thought at all. As said above, How does a judge overpower the 4th? What part of this isn't OK to you (since you acknowledged that a lawsuit may be prudent)? Will you argue that those people (atleast some) weren't forced out of their homes at gunpoint? Will you then argue that this doesn't mean they had no choice? Doesn't that mean then, that something had to be wrong? Think about it. With all the definitions of this incident's terms above, where do you not see that probable cause is needed for an individual's rights to be suspended? And if you have no arguments so far.... then where was the probable cause for each individual (since this is after all about an individual's rights)? They were dead wrong here just as they were in the katrina incident. We aren't busting in mud huts looking for persons of interest here, but that's where we are headed if this crap is allowed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
I Nearly Lost It On FaceBook.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom