Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
If you like your m855, you can keep your m855
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OKCHunter" data-source="post: 2713146" data-attributes="member: 8534"><p>This article presents a concern for those that have M855 in states with laws regarding armor piercing ammunition. Anyone familiar with the Oklahoma law and how M855 owners would be affected?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://modernrifleman.net/2015/02/16/modern-riflemans-comments-on-atf-framework-proposal-m855-ban/" target="_blank">http://modernrifleman.net/2015/02/16/modern-riflemans-comments-on-atf-framework-proposal-m855-ban/</a></p><p> </p><p></p><p>...Arguably the most disturbing part of the proposal is ATF’s dedication to implementing the new rule and associated disregard for the state-level ramifications of such a ruling. At this time, as many as twelve states (Alabama, California, Connecticut, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas) explicitly forbid the possession of armor piercing ammunition. In several of these, possession constitutes a felony. Simply put, the proposal would instantly turn thousands of peaceable gun owners into felons simply because ATF chose to arbitrarily reclassify one of the most popular 5.56mm cartridges on the market. The consequences of such an action could be quite severe, but at minimum, thousands of gun owners will have sufficient standing to bring the agency to court....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OKCHunter, post: 2713146, member: 8534"] This article presents a concern for those that have M855 in states with laws regarding armor piercing ammunition. Anyone familiar with the Oklahoma law and how M855 owners would be affected? [url]http://modernrifleman.net/2015/02/16/modern-riflemans-comments-on-atf-framework-proposal-m855-ban/[/url] ...Arguably the most disturbing part of the proposal is ATF’s dedication to implementing the new rule and associated disregard for the state-level ramifications of such a ruling. At this time, as many as twelve states (Alabama, California, Connecticut, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas) explicitly forbid the possession of armor piercing ammunition. In several of these, possession constitutes a felony. Simply put, the proposal would instantly turn thousands of peaceable gun owners into felons simply because ATF chose to arbitrarily reclassify one of the most popular 5.56mm cartridges on the market. The consequences of such an action could be quite severe, but at minimum, thousands of gun owners will have sufficient standing to bring the agency to court.... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
If you like your m855, you can keep your m855
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom