Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Imagine the possible legal implications!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3179031" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>There's a very simple solution to that problem. As you say, we can abrogate a treaty. As I've said, there's a process for doing so. Nothing about a court decision in the appellant's favor would stop the Congress from stepping up and taking the appropriate steps to do so, even after such a decision is rendered.</p><p></p><p>Whether the political will exists is a political question, not a legal question, and such things are "non-justiciable."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3179031, member: 13624"] There's a very simple solution to that problem. As you say, we can abrogate a treaty. As I've said, there's a process for doing so. Nothing about a court decision in the appellant's favor would stop the Congress from stepping up and taking the appropriate steps to do so, even after such a decision is rendered. Whether the political will exists is a political question, not a legal question, and such things are "non-justiciable." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Imagine the possible legal implications!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom