Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
In a room with no drugs or explosives...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1976413" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>...the dogs "hit" 85.5% of the time.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html" target="_blank">http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html</a></p><p><a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html" target="_blank"></a></p><p><a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html" target="_blank"></a>They were also twice as likely to hit on the markers intended to fool the handlers than to hit on sausage.</p><p></p><p>Relevancy: <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-jardines/" target="_blank">Florida v. Jardines</a>; <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-harris/" target="_blank">Florida v. Harris</a>; both are drug dog cases before the Supreme Court this term. The former centers on the question of whether your front porch is considered part of the curtilage of your home for Fourth Amendment purposes, and the latter centers on whether applicability of evidence established by the use of a dog should depend on training and field records maintained by the department conducting the search.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1976413, member: 5151"] ...the dogs "hit" 85.5% of the time. [URL="http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html"]http://www.springerlink.com/content/j477277481125291/fulltext.html [/URL]They were also twice as likely to hit on the markers intended to fool the handlers than to hit on sausage. Relevancy: [URL="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-jardines/"]Florida v. Jardines[/URL]; [URL="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-harris/"]Florida v. Harris[/URL]; both are drug dog cases before the Supreme Court this term. The former centers on the question of whether your front porch is considered part of the curtilage of your home for Fourth Amendment purposes, and the latter centers on whether applicability of evidence established by the use of a dog should depend on training and field records maintained by the department conducting the search. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
In a room with no drugs or explosives...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom