Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge Roger Benitez Is About To Rattle Gun Control In California
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cat City Slim" data-source="post: 3965340" data-attributes="member: 42075"><p>I think that eventually all of the states will ignore federal firearms laws and set the laws on a state-by-state basis. That is probably the best thing that could happen. I can live with California doing whatever it wants. Those that don't like their firearm laws can vote with their feet. By the same token, if the legislature of Oklahoma chooses not to enforce the new federal rules concerning pistol braces in Oklahoma, there should be no federal interference with that decision. At this point, I don't believe that the federal government has the will to use the military to enforce federal law in an unwilling state. The federal government's only power is budgetary. If a state is willing to give up the federal money, the federal government's only recourse is use of force.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cat City Slim, post: 3965340, member: 42075"] I think that eventually all of the states will ignore federal firearms laws and set the laws on a state-by-state basis. That is probably the best thing that could happen. I can live with California doing whatever it wants. Those that don't like their firearm laws can vote with their feet. By the same token, if the legislature of Oklahoma chooses not to enforce the new federal rules concerning pistol braces in Oklahoma, there should be no federal interference with that decision. At this point, I don't believe that the federal government has the will to use the military to enforce federal law in an unwilling state. The federal government's only power is budgetary. If a state is willing to give up the federal money, the federal government's only recourse is use of force. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge Roger Benitez Is About To Rattle Gun Control In California
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom