Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Parks 788" data-source="post: 4045555" data-attributes="member: 14646"><p>The landowner of the 22K acres seems like a d-bag. $7.75M in damages to his ranch? Would have like the ranch owner to have to had paid the hunters legal fees. Probably a greedy bastard at least and an arrogant A-hole in social settings. Part of his issue what he thought the hunters would have had to hold onto one or two of his corner posts to get over the fence and that was, in part, what constituted the treaspass. SOme of you may flame me but when there is a situation where there are four corners of land that meet and two opposing tracts of land are private and the two other tracts are public land the govt should be able to take 3-5' off the corner of the property to allow unfettered foot traffic to access the public land. In WY, you can't block access to public lands afterall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Parks 788, post: 4045555, member: 14646"] The landowner of the 22K acres seems like a d-bag. $7.75M in damages to his ranch? Would have like the ranch owner to have to had paid the hunters legal fees. Probably a greedy bastard at least and an arrogant A-hole in social settings. Part of his issue what he thought the hunters would have had to hold onto one or two of his corner posts to get over the fence and that was, in part, what constituted the treaspass. SOme of you may flame me but when there is a situation where there are four corners of land that meet and two opposing tracts of land are private and the two other tracts are public land the govt should be able to take 3-5' off the corner of the property to allow unfettered foot traffic to access the public land. In WY, you can't block access to public lands afterall. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom