Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 4195850" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>I was just going to post the same thing. He's lost at every turn, and he'll try to circumvent the eventual ruling somehow. He's going to FA until he FO and forces the government to declare imminent domain and create a travel easement with a maintained .gov road around or thru every piece of property he owns. Douche bag has it coming. </p><p></p><p>Hunter's licenses & fees pay for that public land. Restricting access for the benefit of a single landowner should be criminal. It's going to reduce the value of his land by $9mm dollars because the government is going to take back 20,000 acres he's pirated from the public. Cry me a river, ya F'ing azzhole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 4195850, member: 10690"] I was just going to post the same thing. He's lost at every turn, and he'll try to circumvent the eventual ruling somehow. He's going to FA until he FO and forces the government to declare imminent domain and create a travel easement with a maintained .gov road around or thru every piece of property he owns. Douche bag has it coming. Hunter's licenses & fees pay for that public land. Restricting access for the benefit of a single landowner should be criminal. It's going to reduce the value of his land by $9mm dollars because the government is going to take back 20,000 acres he's pirated from the public. Cry me a river, ya F'ing azzhole. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom