Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OHJEEZE" data-source="post: 4197047" data-attributes="member: 47878"><p>Those hunters trespassed, plain and simple.</p><p></p><p>In the early days of land ownership they explained a person who owned land owned "to the heavens above and to the depths of hell".</p><p></p><p>When airplanes came to being the government stole a easment from the land owners. If I remember corectly that easment starts at 600 feet and goes higher. Land owners and future generations get the shaft!</p><p></p><p>Eminent domain = Land owners get the shaft</p><p></p><p>Easement by necessity = Land owner gets the shaft</p><p></p><p>Property taxes = Land owner gets the shaft</p><p></p><p>So in ruling corner crossing is ok, I say once again the private land owner got the shaft</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A better solution is forcing the government to sell land-locked land holdings to a bordering private land owner for fair market value!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OHJEEZE, post: 4197047, member: 47878"] Those hunters trespassed, plain and simple. In the early days of land ownership they explained a person who owned land owned "to the heavens above and to the depths of hell". When airplanes came to being the government stole a easment from the land owners. If I remember corectly that easment starts at 600 feet and goes higher. Land owners and future generations get the shaft! Eminent domain = Land owners get the shaft Easement by necessity = Land owner gets the shaft Property taxes = Land owner gets the shaft So in ruling corner crossing is ok, I say once again the private land owner got the shaft A better solution is forcing the government to sell land-locked land holdings to a bordering private land owner for fair market value!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Judge rules in favor of corner-crossing hunters
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom