Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shootin 4 Fun" data-source="post: 2786951" data-attributes="member: 6465"><p>It should, but how far back do we go? To Reagan? Do we only charge the Presidents or do start at the bottom with the first sworn officials and work our way up the ladder? That's another discussion though. </p><p></p><p>What she is doing is no different than chief law enforcement officers refusing to sign off on Class III purchases. We have the right to own these weapons, but some government officials are choosing to deny us these rights based on their personal beliefs. </p><p></p><p>Her religious freedoms are no more important than a homosexual couple's right to marry. </p><p></p><p>Are you comfortable with government employees determining which rights they will allow you to enjoy based on their opinions?</p><p></p><p>What I find truly ironic about this woman is that after multiple divorces she feels that somehow she is defending the sanctity of marriage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shootin 4 Fun, post: 2786951, member: 6465"] It should, but how far back do we go? To Reagan? Do we only charge the Presidents or do start at the bottom with the first sworn officials and work our way up the ladder? That's another discussion though. What she is doing is no different than chief law enforcement officers refusing to sign off on Class III purchases. We have the right to own these weapons, but some government officials are choosing to deny us these rights based on their personal beliefs. Her religious freedoms are no more important than a homosexual couple's right to marry. Are you comfortable with government employees determining which rights they will allow you to enjoy based on their opinions? What I find truly ironic about this woman is that after multiple divorces she feels that somehow she is defending the sanctity of marriage. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom