Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 2786995" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Her right to protest does not make her free from criticism (especially related to being selective about which religious issues she chooses to protest/ her own hypocrisy). Nor does it make her free from repercussions from her protest. </p><p></p><p>What most people seem to be pointing out is that public servants should not be allowed to impose their personal religious views on others by denying equal access under the law. If she doesn't like an aspect of her job, she should quit. It's not her job to hold the rights of others hostage to her personal views. As many have pointed out throughout this thread, there are many examples of people who are not free to pick and choose who they help because of their personal views. Would people really be rallying to protect her religious freedom if she was refusing to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 2786995, member: 277"] Her right to protest does not make her free from criticism (especially related to being selective about which religious issues she chooses to protest/ her own hypocrisy). Nor does it make her free from repercussions from her protest. What most people seem to be pointing out is that public servants should not be allowed to impose their personal religious views on others by denying equal access under the law. If she doesn't like an aspect of her job, she should quit. It's not her job to hold the rights of others hostage to her personal views. As many have pointed out throughout this thread, there are many examples of people who are not free to pick and choose who they help because of their personal views. Would people really be rallying to protect her religious freedom if she was refusing to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom