Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riley" data-source="post: 2791298" data-attributes="member: 29196"><p>I read an interesting review yesterday in which Huckabee made a good point; there is no law for her to follow. </p><p></p><p>The supremacy's decision, no matter how flawed, Kagan and Ginsburg should have, under the rules of the court, recused themselves from the decision due to their officiating at same sex ceremonies prior to hearing the case.</p><p></p><p>But even so, the decision does not write new law. That is up to the legislature to do. As yet, they have not done so. It is important to remember that what, 28 states?, have constitutional revisions to comply with the decision.</p><p></p><p>I thought this perspective was interesting and I had not yet heard it covered. So there it is....</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/stop_saying_samesex_marriage_is_the_law_of_the_land.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/stop_saying_samesex_marriage_is_the_law_of_the_land.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riley, post: 2791298, member: 29196"] I read an interesting review yesterday in which Huckabee made a good point; there is no law for her to follow. The supremacy's decision, no matter how flawed, Kagan and Ginsburg should have, under the rules of the court, recused themselves from the decision due to their officiating at same sex ceremonies prior to hearing the case. But even so, the decision does not write new law. That is up to the legislature to do. As yet, they have not done so. It is important to remember that what, 28 states?, have constitutional revisions to comply with the decision. I thought this perspective was interesting and I had not yet heard it covered. So there it is.... [url]http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/stop_saying_samesex_marriage_is_the_law_of_the_land.html[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom