Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wawazat" data-source="post: 3586372" data-attributes="member: 35603"><p>That's a terrible story filled with nuance that I don't see being able to codify. If I was sitting on his jury, I would not convict him based on the information at hand. A lapse in license isn't enough for me to remove his assumed right to protect himself from someone breaking into his warehouse. Even on the other side of the door, if I was in his position I would assume the person was willing to take my life for the contents of my building.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure it is a racially motivated decision by the DA, but it is more about them figuring out how the law needs to handle a brand new scenario that wasn't possible 5 years ago. Where it gets muddy is that if we decide he had the right to self defense, are we creating a precedent for someone that shoots someone else trying to take their coke, heroin, meth, etc stash?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wawazat, post: 3586372, member: 35603"] That's a terrible story filled with nuance that I don't see being able to codify. If I was sitting on his jury, I would not convict him based on the information at hand. A lapse in license isn't enough for me to remove his assumed right to protect himself from someone breaking into his warehouse. Even on the other side of the door, if I was in his position I would assume the person was willing to take my life for the contents of my building. I'm not sure it is a racially motivated decision by the DA, but it is more about them figuring out how the law needs to handle a brand new scenario that wasn't possible 5 years ago. Where it gets muddy is that if we decide he had the right to self defense, are we creating a precedent for someone that shoots someone else trying to take their coke, heroin, meth, etc stash? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom