Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3589143" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>I think we have a misunderstanding involving two separate sentence structure/syntax interpretations here. You stated that he did not start with an illegal operation. I agreed. I concurred. You did not state that it started out as an illegal operation. I simply repeated that he did not start with an illegal operation <strong>as you stated</strong> that it was not an illegal operation at the start. Got it? Good.</p><p></p><p>All the rest is just my opinion formed by my analysis of the circumstances, the available information, bereft of any personal bias, and the fact that the state was aware of the grow operation and did nothing to secure it.</p><p></p><p>My personal bias against criminals would relish a cleansing of the gene pool - one down one to go - but Brachter will get to stand trial before he faces any comeuppance, and neither you nor I can know what that might be. What he is charged with at this point in time is not a statement of guilt and he is therefore innocent until a trial proves he is guilty as charged. For now, he is entitled to the benefit of any doubt.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and I'm not the Constitutional Cowboy. I am the ConstitutionCowboy. I only ride herd for the Constitutions - federal and state. You know, stuff like the RKBA shall not be infringed, etc. I'm not the "StatuteCowboy."</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3589143, member: 745"] I think we have a misunderstanding involving two separate sentence structure/syntax interpretations here. You stated that he did not start with an illegal operation. I agreed. I concurred. You did not state that it started out as an illegal operation. I simply repeated that he did not start with an illegal operation [B]as you stated[/B] that it was not an illegal operation at the start. Got it? Good. All the rest is just my opinion formed by my analysis of the circumstances, the available information, bereft of any personal bias, and the fact that the state was aware of the grow operation and did nothing to secure it. My personal bias against criminals would relish a cleansing of the gene pool - one down one to go - but Brachter will get to stand trial before he faces any comeuppance, and neither you nor I can know what that might be. What he is charged with at this point in time is not a statement of guilt and he is therefore innocent until a trial proves he is guilty as charged. For now, he is entitled to the benefit of any doubt. Oh, and I'm not the Constitutional Cowboy. I am the ConstitutionCowboy. I only ride herd for the Constitutions - federal and state. You know, stuff like the RKBA shall not be infringed, etc. I'm not the "StatuteCowboy." Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
LaRue Brachter
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom