I know. I mean; it's only a reliable tactical-style .22 pistol that eats any .22lr ammo you feed it and is ridiculously easy to break down and clean. I mean, where's the fun in shooting hundreds and hundreds of trouble free rounds? How's a guy supposed to practice malfunction drills when it just won't malfunction? And it's soooo expensive too; at $270. And those damn magazines; so easy to load and so trouble free as well. And the ergonomics of the thing; there's not much you can do to improve on them so again; where's the fun in putting hundreds more dollars worth of add-ons and modifications if the thing just runs great right outta the box anyway?
Yeah; don't get one. You'll just get bored drilling bullseyes over and over again with cheap bulk pack .22lr ammo with no stopping to whine and moan about the problems you're having with it. About the best you can hope for is a bad batch of ammo so you can at least get some training benefit from it.
It does not. The full size is an Umarex made pistol while the Compact is a single action pistol made by S&W. Google mag extensions for the 22C; I think it’s Nic Taylor who makes this but again, Google-ize it to be sure. Regardless, the 22C is one excellent little rimfire that I really think you’d like. A search here on OSA will bring more info if you are interested.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree; it's not exactly like an M&P Compact and not exactly like a Shield...I like the frame; the grip actually, of the 22C better than either and would jump on a 9mm with this frame/grip in a heartbeat.
One of the interesting things about the 22C to me is that it is a single action pistol rather than being striker fired, as many seem to think it is.
Similar threads
