Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Born in 1846 Talks About the 1860s and Fighting in the Civil War - Restored Audio..sounds like today IMO
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3842779" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>yes again, it's a simple question that the people who keep crying "muh slavery" won't even attempt to answer.</p><p></p><p>>was the South fighting to *impose* slavery in the North?</p><p>>was the North fighting to *end* slavery in the South?</p><p></p><p>these aren't mutual. we fought to "end terrorism" when we invaded the middle east. i remember W flying in on that jet and declaring "mission accomplished" but last time i checked there's still terrorism, especially in that part of the world?</p><p></p><p>like i established in my previous posts, *slavery does indeed still exist in the world, and arguably in every major city in the US, particularly the "sanctuary cities".*</p><p></p><p>if you view the war as the South fighting the North, being the aggressor, how can you be an aggressor when you are fighting to *maintain* something that is being eliminated thru an external force?</p><p> </p><p>if you view the war as the North fighting the South, being the aggressor, then it makes sense how the North would be literally *invading* the South in order to end slavery. ***of course*** it makes sense for the media manipulators of the times then *and* the times now to refer to the civil war as a "war on slavery".</p><p></p><p>but as my analogy, it is really proper to call our middle east engagements, the longest in US history, a "war on terror"?</p><p></p><p>a war on drugs?</p><p></p><p>like, you're still operating under the completely false assumption that the South being defeated *ended* slavery.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3842779, member: 45524"] yes again, it's a simple question that the people who keep crying "muh slavery" won't even attempt to answer. >was the South fighting to *impose* slavery in the North? >was the North fighting to *end* slavery in the South? these aren't mutual. we fought to "end terrorism" when we invaded the middle east. i remember W flying in on that jet and declaring "mission accomplished" but last time i checked there's still terrorism, especially in that part of the world? like i established in my previous posts, *slavery does indeed still exist in the world, and arguably in every major city in the US, particularly the "sanctuary cities".* if you view the war as the South fighting the North, being the aggressor, how can you be an aggressor when you are fighting to *maintain* something that is being eliminated thru an external force? if you view the war as the North fighting the South, being the aggressor, then it makes sense how the North would be literally *invading* the South in order to end slavery. ***of course*** it makes sense for the media manipulators of the times then *and* the times now to refer to the civil war as a "war on slavery". but as my analogy, it is really proper to call our middle east engagements, the longest in US history, a "war on terror"? a war on drugs? like, you're still operating under the completely false assumption that the South being defeated *ended* slavery. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Man Born in 1846 Talks About the 1860s and Fighting in the Civil War - Restored Audio..sounds like today IMO
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom