Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Man who defended himself with licensed gun may still face charges
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="0311" data-source="post: 2449672" data-attributes="member: 26943"><p>The maintenance worker had every right to be there, but it was an area known to be dangerous. I'll select a few paragraphs to try to emphasize what I mean.</p><p></p><p>"On Wednesday afternoon, the currently unidentified maintenance worker was accosted by three young individuals while he was changing the locks at an apartment located in a rough area of Milwaukee. According to Fox6 News, the three assailants mistook the janitor for the building manager and attacked him over the fact that one of their friends was put on notice for eviction."</p><p></p><p>The paragraph above states that the apartment was located in a rough area of Milwaukee.</p><p></p><p>"His lawyer told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that his client has a permit to carry a handgun and feels it is an “occupational necessity” to carry a firearm with him."</p><p></p><p>The paragraph above states that the maintenance worker has a permit to carry because occupational necessity.</p><p></p><p>"A friend of the assault victim says that he is a “peaceful” man who has worked many years in an area that others would refuse to work in."</p><p></p><p>In the sentence above, the article states he has worked for many years in an area that others refuse to work in. I assert that he voluntarily went into an area he knew was dangerous, and was attacked. If he had avoided the danger area, he would not been attacked by this trio and would not have shot and killed the 17 year old girl.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="0311, post: 2449672, member: 26943"] The maintenance worker had every right to be there, but it was an area known to be dangerous. I'll select a few paragraphs to try to emphasize what I mean. "On Wednesday afternoon, the currently unidentified maintenance worker was accosted by three young individuals while he was changing the locks at an apartment located in a rough area of Milwaukee. According to Fox6 News, the three assailants mistook the janitor for the building manager and attacked him over the fact that one of their friends was put on notice for eviction." The paragraph above states that the apartment was located in a rough area of Milwaukee. "His lawyer told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that his client has a permit to carry a handgun and feels it is an “occupational necessity” to carry a firearm with him." The paragraph above states that the maintenance worker has a permit to carry because occupational necessity. "A friend of the assault victim says that he is a “peaceful” man who has worked many years in an area that others would refuse to work in." In the sentence above, the article states he has worked for many years in an area that others refuse to work in. I assert that he voluntarily went into an area he knew was dangerous, and was attacked. If he had avoided the danger area, he would not been attacked by this trio and would not have shot and killed the 17 year old girl. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Man who defended himself with licensed gun may still face charges
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom