Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Massage parlor shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DavidMcmillan" data-source="post: 3543366" data-attributes="member: 11749"><p>That all sounds very logical, but it is not practical. For the most part, these individuals that commit mass shootings, or individual shootings, have very little indications in their past that would rise to the level of "locking them up". We cannot begin incarcerating people who may become violent in the future. However, in most cases, the individuals have exhibited the potential to commit violence. The current background checking system does a poor job of identifying those types of folks, especially the ones with mental issues of a minor, but potentially serious, problem. The guy here in OKC that did a shooting at a local Louie's restaurant a couple of years ago is a good example. He should not have had access to a firearm, but how do we stop that without "infringing" upon his rights? Not everyone should have access to firearms or sharp instruments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DavidMcmillan, post: 3543366, member: 11749"] That all sounds very logical, but it is not practical. For the most part, these individuals that commit mass shootings, or individual shootings, have very little indications in their past that would rise to the level of "locking them up". We cannot begin incarcerating people who may become violent in the future. However, in most cases, the individuals have exhibited the potential to commit violence. The current background checking system does a poor job of identifying those types of folks, especially the ones with mental issues of a minor, but potentially serious, problem. The guy here in OKC that did a shooting at a local Louie's restaurant a couple of years ago is a good example. He should not have had access to a firearm, but how do we stop that without "infringing" upon his rights? Not everyone should have access to firearms or sharp instruments. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Massage parlor shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom