Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Maybe Bad Primers?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RetiredTater" data-source="post: 2798632" data-attributes="member: 32190"><p>So the fiance and so went out for a date night on Saturday. Went to the range with pistols in tow and I had about 200 rounds of reloaded 9mm using Winchester Small Pistol Primers and 4.1 grains of IMR 700X powder pushing 115 train Berry round nose bullets. According to the Lee charts, 4.1 was too low, but Hodgdon and Sierra said it was just above minimum. </p><p></p><p>I had tested some out and it was fine out of my Taurus, but this was a different box of primers. First mag out of her 9, and had two FTFs with struck primers, and three FTEs. Swapped to my Taurus, had about same numbers of FTEs, and probably same for primers that had to be hit again. Taurus has DA/SA.</p><p></p><p>Had her switch to factory ammo and she did not have any issues.</p><p></p><p>FTEs I am figuring come from light charges, but the FTFs don't make me happy. I am going to load up another 25 with about 4.5 grains of powder (middle of the road charge) and another box of the primers, but am curious if the Winchester Small Pistols are known for having hard primers? </p><p></p><p>Did have one that even with about 10 trigger pulls did not fire. So held on and waited and nothing happened. Pulled it a part and it had powder.</p><p></p><p>I have never had an issue out of my .40 with these but it is a full-size. So anybody with more experience have the same kind of experience or am I just doing something wrong with my primers? </p><p></p><p>Sent from my LGUS990 using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RetiredTater, post: 2798632, member: 32190"] So the fiance and so went out for a date night on Saturday. Went to the range with pistols in tow and I had about 200 rounds of reloaded 9mm using Winchester Small Pistol Primers and 4.1 grains of IMR 700X powder pushing 115 train Berry round nose bullets. According to the Lee charts, 4.1 was too low, but Hodgdon and Sierra said it was just above minimum. I had tested some out and it was fine out of my Taurus, but this was a different box of primers. First mag out of her 9, and had two FTFs with struck primers, and three FTEs. Swapped to my Taurus, had about same numbers of FTEs, and probably same for primers that had to be hit again. Taurus has DA/SA. Had her switch to factory ammo and she did not have any issues. FTEs I am figuring come from light charges, but the FTFs don't make me happy. I am going to load up another 25 with about 4.5 grains of powder (middle of the road charge) and another box of the primers, but am curious if the Winchester Small Pistols are known for having hard primers? Did have one that even with about 10 trigger pulls did not fire. So held on and waited and nothing happened. Pulled it a part and it had powder. I have never had an issue out of my .40 with these but it is a full-size. So anybody with more experience have the same kind of experience or am I just doing something wrong with my primers? Sent from my LGUS990 using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Maybe Bad Primers?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom