Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mayor supports plan to limit marijuana arrests
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1810488" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>Yes. But I can assure you it wasn't the meth that did it. There are many other factors besides drug of choice. I've also seen people go from being rather lazy when "normal" to being some extremely productive workers (and get high praise from their superiors) while using meth.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The FDA says its good for your kids, with no limit on dosage. <a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/005378s026lbl.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/005378s026lbl.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>In fact, they recommend you start with 5mg to 10mg and increase the dosage in 5mg increments until "optimum" results are achieved. According to the FDA, best results are achieved at around 20-25mg, or one hit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like I said, the crap pseudoephedrine laws we have on the books now are not rooted in preventing meth production. If you <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000024692&year=2006" target="_blank">follow the money</a>, you'll see that the whole "combat meth by preventing access to pseudoephedrine" idea came from the world's largest producer of a proven-to-be-inferior competitor.</p><p></p><p>Politicians sell it as "combating meth". Ignorant sheep buy the idea because they prefer tyranny over free access to medication.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1810488, member: 5151"] Yes. But I can assure you it wasn't the meth that did it. There are many other factors besides drug of choice. I've also seen people go from being rather lazy when "normal" to being some extremely productive workers (and get high praise from their superiors) while using meth. The FDA says its good for your kids, with no limit on dosage. [url]http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/005378s026lbl.pdf[/url] In fact, they recommend you start with 5mg to 10mg and increase the dosage in 5mg increments until "optimum" results are achieved. According to the FDA, best results are achieved at around 20-25mg, or one hit. Like I said, the crap pseudoephedrine laws we have on the books now are not rooted in preventing meth production. If you [URL="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000024692&year=2006"]follow the money[/URL], you'll see that the whole "combat meth by preventing access to pseudoephedrine" idea came from the world's largest producer of a proven-to-be-inferior competitor. Politicians sell it as "combating meth". Ignorant sheep buy the idea because they prefer tyranny over free access to medication. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Mayor supports plan to limit marijuana arrests
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom