Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Missouri Senate Bill 39
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 3479157" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>So they are basically creating a sanctuary state for Missouri like most of the people on the boards here hate. I mean, it sounds like they are creating a "sanctuary state" for the 2A which is well liked here, but there's a certain amount of duplicity in saying how awesome that is when railing on liberal states for being "sanctuary states" for issues like illegal immigrants. </p><p></p><p>At best, the bill --- in my reading of that article, and keeping in mind that I'm not a lawyer --- says what you stated: that they won't cooperate with the feds. Great --- but again, do you want to be the first person that the feds arrest with an unregistered SBR or machine gun? Because it does NOT say that the state will pay your legal fees. That it will shelter you, and protect you and save you from federal custody. So again, cool idea bro, but that doesn't exactly "<strong>Take on All Federal Gun Control: Past, Present and Future" </strong>until they're going to have a strike team ready to bail Joe Bob out for his illegal possession of (fill in the blank here). </p><p></p><p>Here's another hypothetical --- would they stop doing 4473s up there? They could say alllllll they want that the FFL's don't have to, but I'd wager that the FFL's would still do them even if it is an infringement that the state doesn't recognize. Why? Because of the first "F" in FFL. Their license is Federal and they'd be arrested and tried by the Feds for not complying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 3479157, member: 5800"] So they are basically creating a sanctuary state for Missouri like most of the people on the boards here hate. I mean, it sounds like they are creating a "sanctuary state" for the 2A which is well liked here, but there's a certain amount of duplicity in saying how awesome that is when railing on liberal states for being "sanctuary states" for issues like illegal immigrants. At best, the bill --- in my reading of that article, and keeping in mind that I'm not a lawyer --- says what you stated: that they won't cooperate with the feds. Great --- but again, do you want to be the first person that the feds arrest with an unregistered SBR or machine gun? Because it does NOT say that the state will pay your legal fees. That it will shelter you, and protect you and save you from federal custody. So again, cool idea bro, but that doesn't exactly "[B]Take on All Federal Gun Control: Past, Present and Future" [/B]until they're going to have a strike team ready to bail Joe Bob out for his illegal possession of (fill in the blank here). Here's another hypothetical --- would they stop doing 4473s up there? They could say alllllll they want that the FFL's don't have to, but I'd wager that the FFL's would still do them even if it is an infringement that the state doesn't recognize. Why? Because of the first "F" in FFL. Their license is Federal and they'd be arrested and tried by the Feds for not complying. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Missouri Senate Bill 39
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom