Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More “mass” shootings - And its only Saturday
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3780047" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I disagree. There were actions available in this case. He was a know potential threat. While giving room for additional information, it doesn't appear any actions were taken beyond a mental eval. If the mental eval cleared him, then there was no basis to red flag him. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ny.gov/programs/red-flag-gun-protection-law[/URL]</p><p></p><p>This case supports the hypothesis that RF laws are ineffective. That's actually a good thing for the anti-2nd Amendment crowd, because now they can cry for "more". But what do they want? More ineffective laws. If a law is effective at reducing violent crimes where a gun was the tool (like 5 years mandatory in Club Fed for AFCF), that's bad for them. Those are the laws they don't enforce. If they did, then they couldn't cry for "more".</p><p></p><p>Reducing violence was never the goal. The goal was always more control over We The People. Never lose sight of that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3780047, member: 1132"] I disagree. There were actions available in this case. He was a know potential threat. While giving room for additional information, it doesn't appear any actions were taken beyond a mental eval. If the mental eval cleared him, then there was no basis to red flag him. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ny.gov/programs/red-flag-gun-protection-law[/URL] This case supports the hypothesis that RF laws are ineffective. That's actually a good thing for the anti-2nd Amendment crowd, because now they can cry for "more". But what do they want? More ineffective laws. If a law is effective at reducing violent crimes where a gun was the tool (like 5 years mandatory in Club Fed for AFCF), that's bad for them. Those are the laws they don't enforce. If they did, then they couldn't cry for "more". Reducing violence was never the goal. The goal was always more control over We The People. Never lose sight of that. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
More “mass” shootings - And its only Saturday
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom