Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Muslims will not assimilate in the United States
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D. Hargrove" data-source="post: 3007907" data-attributes="member: 41761"><p>Patterns of Radicalization are pretty much a constant regardless of religion or national origin. The "type" that radicalized either on his/her own through realization of self perfected ideology generally formed with regards to socio-economic stimulus/lack thereof and envisionment of self lower than true. The inability or perceived inability to date, marry, find companionship often lends itself directly to the overwhelming desire to fit into any group looking for approval. By forming this ideology and eventually following it we get the likes of Mcveigh, Rudolph and Kaczynski. These "self radicalized" persons are little different than the recruited radicals. The social situations are generally the same as well as the psychological situations, feelings of nowhere to belong, unable to meet the opposite sex, lack of social standing, perceived or very real lack of social graces creates an opportunity for recruitment into any organization that is believed to want them as a person, as a part, as a friend. There is a pile of study that reflects the making of a radicalist, some is used for profiling, some is used to pontificate. Radicalization has occurred since the beginning of time, the level of violence and acceptance that is tolerated is all that has changed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D. Hargrove, post: 3007907, member: 41761"] Patterns of Radicalization are pretty much a constant regardless of religion or national origin. The "type" that radicalized either on his/her own through realization of self perfected ideology generally formed with regards to socio-economic stimulus/lack thereof and envisionment of self lower than true. The inability or perceived inability to date, marry, find companionship often lends itself directly to the overwhelming desire to fit into any group looking for approval. By forming this ideology and eventually following it we get the likes of Mcveigh, Rudolph and Kaczynski. These "self radicalized" persons are little different than the recruited radicals. The social situations are generally the same as well as the psychological situations, feelings of nowhere to belong, unable to meet the opposite sex, lack of social standing, perceived or very real lack of social graces creates an opportunity for recruitment into any organization that is believed to want them as a person, as a part, as a friend. There is a pile of study that reflects the making of a radicalist, some is used for profiling, some is used to pontificate. Radicalization has occurred since the beginning of time, the level of violence and acceptance that is tolerated is all that has changed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Muslims will not assimilate in the United States
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom