Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
My moon child sister in law
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoolShi7Designer" data-source="post: 3625912" data-attributes="member: 48420"><p>Dude, no. Parapsychology, sure they believe it. But no one that actually does quantum field theory, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, or any other real science on the Planck scale has found a single thing that suggests that human thoughts influence physical reality. There is no "observers thoughts" term in the Dirac equation. I'm 1000% on board with live and let live, I'm 1000% onboard with there is lots we don't know, but just like I'd call out anybody proposing perpetual motion, there are things we know aren't correct and "thinking here makes particles do stuff over there" is one thing we know is not real. Decoherence between entangled particles and the literally inconceivable number of interaction involved is what precludes it and it's why we don't see the same probablistic behavior of quantum particles manifest in the deterministic macro scale we live in. I'll peacefully debate values and ethics on any theology or philosophy, but I'll stand strong on my soapbox over bad science.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoolShi7Designer, post: 3625912, member: 48420"] Dude, no. Parapsychology, sure they believe it. But no one that actually does quantum field theory, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, or any other real science on the Planck scale has found a single thing that suggests that human thoughts influence physical reality. There is no "observers thoughts" term in the Dirac equation. I'm 1000% on board with live and let live, I'm 1000% onboard with there is lots we don't know, but just like I'd call out anybody proposing perpetual motion, there are things we know aren't correct and "thinking here makes particles do stuff over there" is one thing we know is not real. Decoherence between entangled particles and the literally inconceivable number of interaction involved is what precludes it and it's why we don't see the same probablistic behavior of quantum particles manifest in the deterministic macro scale we live in. I'll peacefully debate values and ethics on any theology or philosophy, but I'll stand strong on my soapbox over bad science. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
My moon child sister in law
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom