Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
My proof: sweat the details
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tcox" data-source="post: 2868842" data-attributes="member: 10058"><p>I would agree that 6 total rounds at each charge weight is not ideal, however I would have went though an absolute ton of components for a test in which I didn't have a way of knowing whether or not they would produce a good canidate load. I do feel that it is a somewhat comprehensive test as I performed the same test for each charge weight. I should have elaborated on that more, especially since the only photos that I uploaded were for one charge weight. With each charge weight I received similar results, and my worst group with tight tolerances was smaller than any of my groups with looser tolerances. This test was a bi-product of load development. Maybe for the next test I will only test three charge weights and 12 rounds now that I have found my node?</p><p></p><p>I do wish I had chronograph data, I do not have a chrono at this time. I absolutely agree that velocity would be outstanding to have in this testing. </p><p></p><p>Regarding my biases, are you referring to excluding my flyer? If so, given the circumstances, I feel that including a shooters flier would skew the data. If I had felt confident in that shot I think that the flier should be absolutely included, but knowing that I pulled approx 1/2" right I don't think that I could include it on a test that is focused on the loads, not the shooters ability. </p><p></p><p>I appreciatiate your feedback Gus!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tcox, post: 2868842, member: 10058"] I would agree that 6 total rounds at each charge weight is not ideal, however I would have went though an absolute ton of components for a test in which I didn't have a way of knowing whether or not they would produce a good canidate load. I do feel that it is a somewhat comprehensive test as I performed the same test for each charge weight. I should have elaborated on that more, especially since the only photos that I uploaded were for one charge weight. With each charge weight I received similar results, and my worst group with tight tolerances was smaller than any of my groups with looser tolerances. This test was a bi-product of load development. Maybe for the next test I will only test three charge weights and 12 rounds now that I have found my node? I do wish I had chronograph data, I do not have a chrono at this time. I absolutely agree that velocity would be outstanding to have in this testing. Regarding my biases, are you referring to excluding my flyer? If so, given the circumstances, I feel that including a shooters flier would skew the data. If I had felt confident in that shot I think that the flier should be absolutely included, but knowing that I pulled approx 1/2" right I don't think that I could include it on a test that is focused on the loads, not the shooters ability. I appreciatiate your feedback Gus! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
My proof: sweat the details
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom