Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
My Worthless CCW "training" class & Constitutional Carry Opponets
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buzzdraw" data-source="post: 2880210" data-attributes="member: 385"><p>The Self Defense Act (21 O.S. 1290) does have a set of standards for instruction. Essentially there are two parts; legal and firearms. </p><p></p><p>I have found it entirely possible to instruct individuals in basic handgun safe use and application in the allowed time period. I do as much hands-on classroom and dryfire as possible to conserve time. I teach both loading and unloading double action revolvers and semi auto pistols in the classroom utilizing dummy ammo. I feel its important to introduce individuals to both since they are viable and commonly carried self defense handguns.</p><p></p><p>I tell students with no prior firearms experience to not worry about it; what they need to know will be revealed in class. I deliver on it. </p><p></p><p>As far as standards for live range go, i will not pass a student that is unsafe or cannot handle the firearm of their choice. Thus far I have been able to invite that rare student back for a 2 hour one-on-one remedial session and pass all the few who didn't initially pass.</p><p></p><p>I don't necessarily want CLEET to promulgate a minimum passing score on such and such a target. Too many issues including scoring irregularities and the like may result. The intent of 1290 is to have the student safe among the general public; the current standard allows that.</p><p></p><p>I do encourage refresher range time at least every 3 months (25 rounds minimum) as well as annual re-reading of the statutes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buzzdraw, post: 2880210, member: 385"] The Self Defense Act (21 O.S. 1290) does have a set of standards for instruction. Essentially there are two parts; legal and firearms. I have found it entirely possible to instruct individuals in basic handgun safe use and application in the allowed time period. I do as much hands-on classroom and dryfire as possible to conserve time. I teach both loading and unloading double action revolvers and semi auto pistols in the classroom utilizing dummy ammo. I feel its important to introduce individuals to both since they are viable and commonly carried self defense handguns. I tell students with no prior firearms experience to not worry about it; what they need to know will be revealed in class. I deliver on it. As far as standards for live range go, i will not pass a student that is unsafe or cannot handle the firearm of their choice. Thus far I have been able to invite that rare student back for a 2 hour one-on-one remedial session and pass all the few who didn't initially pass. I don't necessarily want CLEET to promulgate a minimum passing score on such and such a target. Too many issues including scoring irregularities and the like may result. The intent of 1290 is to have the student safe among the general public; the current standard allows that. I do encourage refresher range time at least every 3 months (25 rounds minimum) as well as annual re-reading of the statutes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
My Worthless CCW "training" class & Constitutional Carry Opponets
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom