Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
NAA 22 revolver
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 1221985" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>wait a minute now... under ANY situation???? </p><p></p><p>I'd take a .22 mag NAA over nothing anyday!</p><p></p><p>by the way .22 mag ammo tend to be higher $$ so have better quality controls. which IMHO is the main issue with .22LR ammo purchased in bulk like the infamous Remington .22LR from wallyworld. I've gotten 50+ duds out of a brick. </p><p></p><p>but with quality .22LR or .22mag ... I've yet to experience FTF due to primer failure anymore than center fire ammo. </p><p></p><p>so yes.. any ammo can fail due to primer not igniting... but going by first hand experience over a number of years, over thousands of rounds. failure to fire due to primer failure is about the same for centerfire and quality .22 rimfire. </p><p></p><p>naturally your mileage my veri... but that's been my experience</p><p>I'm very comfortable with .22 mag ammo firing reliably. by the way, anyone that's going to carry ANY type of ammo for self defense... needs to have shot a fair amount of EXACT same ammo to establish point of impact and reliability. </p><p></p><p>which leads to one HUGE advantage of NAA and inherent with all revolvers vs small auto's. with cost of self defensive ammo ... how many folks pay say $30 per 20 rounds to actually shoot say a few hundred rounds to establish feed reliability for small auto's?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 1221985, member: 7629"] wait a minute now... under ANY situation???? I'd take a .22 mag NAA over nothing anyday! by the way .22 mag ammo tend to be higher $$ so have better quality controls. which IMHO is the main issue with .22LR ammo purchased in bulk like the infamous Remington .22LR from wallyworld. I've gotten 50+ duds out of a brick. but with quality .22LR or .22mag ... I've yet to experience FTF due to primer failure anymore than center fire ammo. so yes.. any ammo can fail due to primer not igniting... but going by first hand experience over a number of years, over thousands of rounds. failure to fire due to primer failure is about the same for centerfire and quality .22 rimfire. naturally your mileage my veri... but that's been my experience I'm very comfortable with .22 mag ammo firing reliably. by the way, anyone that's going to carry ANY type of ammo for self defense... needs to have shot a fair amount of EXACT same ammo to establish point of impact and reliability. which leads to one HUGE advantage of NAA and inherent with all revolvers vs small auto's. with cost of self defensive ammo ... how many folks pay say $30 per 20 rounds to actually shoot say a few hundred rounds to establish feed reliability for small auto's? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
NAA 22 revolver
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom