Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
NAA 22 revolver
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 1222064" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>My points all still stand.</p><p></p><p>I said there are several problems with relying on the NAA .22 mag revolver for self-defense (and then listed them in order). All of those problems are still valid - including the fact that rimfire ammo is still not as reliable as center-fire (no matter what the price is).</p><p></p><p>I'm curious as to how many rounds of .22 mag you've shot that you've never experienced a failure to ignite - I hear the "I've never had a problem" thing all the time, but depending on what numbers you're actually talking about, it means different things. </p><p></p><p>I've shot well more than 1000 rds of .22 mag and experienced around 5 failures (some were with Winchester Dynapoints, a few were with CCI Maxi-Mags). </p><p></p><p>I've shot at least twice that many rounds of Speer Gold Dot and never experienced a failure.</p><p></p><p>I've shot near 1000 rds of Federal HydraShok and never experienced a failure.</p><p></p><p>Right around 600 rds of Remington Golden Saber and never a failure of any kind.</p><p></p><p>About 1500 rds of Winchester Ranger +P+ and aside from light strikes on the primer (problem with a particular gun getting crap in the FP hole), no failures.</p><p></p><p>The other issues of carrying the NAA (non-ammo related) are still valid too.</p><p></p><p>Its a cool little gun and I'm not bashing anyone for carrying one - just making sure that folks understand the risks if they do.</p><p></p><p>Stay alert and careful out there - I'd practice like hell in drawing/shooting if I carried that gun (as I do with any gun).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 1222064, member: 229"] My points all still stand. I said there are several problems with relying on the NAA .22 mag revolver for self-defense (and then listed them in order). All of those problems are still valid - including the fact that rimfire ammo is still not as reliable as center-fire (no matter what the price is). I'm curious as to how many rounds of .22 mag you've shot that you've never experienced a failure to ignite - I hear the "I've never had a problem" thing all the time, but depending on what numbers you're actually talking about, it means different things. I've shot well more than 1000 rds of .22 mag and experienced around 5 failures (some were with Winchester Dynapoints, a few were with CCI Maxi-Mags). I've shot at least twice that many rounds of Speer Gold Dot and never experienced a failure. I've shot near 1000 rds of Federal HydraShok and never experienced a failure. Right around 600 rds of Remington Golden Saber and never a failure of any kind. About 1500 rds of Winchester Ranger +P+ and aside from light strikes on the primer (problem with a particular gun getting crap in the FP hole), no failures. The other issues of carrying the NAA (non-ammo related) are still valid too. Its a cool little gun and I'm not bashing anyone for carrying one - just making sure that folks understand the risks if they do. Stay alert and careful out there - I'd practice like hell in drawing/shooting if I carried that gun (as I do with any gun). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
NAA 22 revolver
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom