Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Net Neutrality is dead
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riley" data-source="post: 3062704" data-attributes="member: 29196"><p>Here's a decent article that addresses some of the regulatory overreach corrected by the removal, again, of NN.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2017/12/15/net-neutrality-happened-whats-next/" target="_blank">https://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2017/12/15/net-neutrality-happened-whats-next/</a></p><p></p><p>Cliff notes: "First off, <a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1214/DOC-348261A1.pdf" target="_blank">in the FCC’s own words</a>, here’s what their vote Thursday actually <em>does</em>:</p><p></p><p>Restores the classification of broadband Internet access service as an “information service” under Title I of the Communications Act – the classification affirmed by the Supreme Court in the 2005 Brand X case.</p><p></p><p>This is what Barack Obama’s Open Internet Order (aka Net Neutrality) was really all about"</p><p></p><p>"Restores the classification of broadband Internet access service as an “information service” under Title I of the Communications Act—the classification affirmed by the Supreme Court in the 2005 Brand X case."</p><p></p><p>"Restores broadband consumer protection authority to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), enabling it to apply its extensive expertise to provide uniform online protections against unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive practices."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riley, post: 3062704, member: 29196"] Here's a decent article that addresses some of the regulatory overreach corrected by the removal, again, of NN. [URL]https://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2017/12/15/net-neutrality-happened-whats-next/[/URL] Cliff notes: "First off, [URL='http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1214/DOC-348261A1.pdf']in the FCC’s own words[/URL], here’s what their vote Thursday actually [I]does[/I]: Restores the classification of broadband Internet access service as an “information service” under Title I of the Communications Act – the classification affirmed by the Supreme Court in the 2005 Brand X case. This is what Barack Obama’s Open Internet Order (aka Net Neutrality) was really all about" "Restores the classification of broadband Internet access service as an “information service” under Title I of the Communications Act—the classification affirmed by the Supreme Court in the 2005 Brand X case." "Restores broadband consumer protection authority to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), enabling it to apply its extensive expertise to provide uniform online protections against unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive practices." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Net Neutrality is dead
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom