Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
New carry weapon...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JeffT" data-source="post: 3323534" data-attributes="member: 11091"><p>The poll will not allow multiple votes. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p>S/A XDM 3.8" Compact or M&P 2.0 Compact are the two for which I would vote.</p><p>I have carried the XDM for about 6 or 7 years now, and they are very accurate and very well performing.</p><p>The M&P 2.0 is about the same, the grip angle is just a little different. I have had it for a little more than a year now.</p><p>Both of them will eat just about everything I have fed them, and are very accurate. The trigger on the M&P is a little shorter reset, maybe 3 or 4 hundredths of an inch. That is the only noticeable difference that I have found. The grip texture on the M&P is also a little more aggressive, so it may not be as comfortable when carried in an IWB holster against your skin, if you are sensitive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JeffT, post: 3323534, member: 11091"] The poll will not allow multiple votes. :( S/A XDM 3.8" Compact or M&P 2.0 Compact are the two for which I would vote. I have carried the XDM for about 6 or 7 years now, and they are very accurate and very well performing. The M&P 2.0 is about the same, the grip angle is just a little different. I have had it for a little more than a year now. Both of them will eat just about everything I have fed them, and are very accurate. The trigger on the M&P is a little shorter reset, maybe 3 or 4 hundredths of an inch. That is the only noticeable difference that I have found. The grip texture on the M&P is also a little more aggressive, so it may not be as comfortable when carried in an IWB holster against your skin, if you are sensitive. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
New carry weapon...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom