Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
New Court Decision: Self Defense in Kansas
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jej" data-source="post: 862619" data-attributes="member: 5563"><p>This link is to the Volokh Conspiracy blog. Professor Volokh teaches law at UCLA. He and a couple of the other bloggers there generally present well reasoned pro-second amendment articles and argument. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, this</p><p></p><p><a href="http://volokh.com/2009/10/23/defending-yourself-against-attack-by-threatening-force-is-a-crime-in-kansas/" target="_blank">http://volokh.com/2009/10/23/defending-yourself-against-attack-by-threatening-force-is-a-crime-in-kansas/</a></p><p></p><p>post discusses a Kansas supreme court case that stands for the proposition that, in Kansas, one may use deadly force in defense, but may not use threats. </p><p></p><p>I don't know if this is a stupid law, or a stupid interpretation of a good law. Maybe it is just a good reason to stay on the OK side of the state line. </p><p></p><p>I expect that this is the sort of bad court outcome that the Kansas legislature will address eventually, but for now, its law there.</p><p></p><p>jej</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jej, post: 862619, member: 5563"] This link is to the Volokh Conspiracy blog. Professor Volokh teaches law at UCLA. He and a couple of the other bloggers there generally present well reasoned pro-second amendment articles and argument. Anyway, this [url]http://volokh.com/2009/10/23/defending-yourself-against-attack-by-threatening-force-is-a-crime-in-kansas/[/url] post discusses a Kansas supreme court case that stands for the proposition that, in Kansas, one may use deadly force in defense, but may not use threats. I don't know if this is a stupid law, or a stupid interpretation of a good law. Maybe it is just a good reason to stay on the OK side of the state line. I expect that this is the sort of bad court outcome that the Kansas legislature will address eventually, but for now, its law there. jej [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
New Court Decision: Self Defense in Kansas
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom