New Federal Law Will Promote Target Range Development on Public Lands

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,575
Reaction score
55,719
Location
NW OK


https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...mote-target-range-development-on-public-lands
New Federal Law Will Promote Target Range Development on Public Lands
Friday, May 24, 2019

On May 10, President Trump signed the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act into law. This NRA-backed law will help promote firearm safety and training and enjoyment of the shooting sports by freeing up more federal funds for use in public shooting range development and construction.

Beginning in 1937 with the passage of the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act – commonly known as the Pittman-Robertson Act (P-R Act) – federal excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment have been returned to the states to help promote wildlife conservation and restoration. Participating states must ensure that hunting license fees are used exclusively for the administration of the state’s fish and game department.

Fifty percent of the excise tax revenue from handguns, bows, and arrows may be used for hunter education programs and the development and operation of archery and firearm shooting ranges. Additionally, there is an $8 million annual set-aside for firearm and bow hunter education and safety program grants within the states, which can also help fund ranges.

The P-R Act has been critical in preserving America’s hunting and sport-shooting heritage. State wildlife management programs have brought back species that in the early 1900s were in severe decline or on the brink of extinction, including white tailed deer, wild turkey, and wood ducks. Managed hunting, of course, plays a critical role in this responsible stewardship.

The Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act (S. 94/H.R. 1222) amended the P-R Act to provide states greater opportunities to use the P-R funds apportioned to them for public range development.

First, the Act reduces the states’ mandatory matching share for a range development project from 25% to 10%*(a state, in other words, only needs to provide 10% of the funding, while P-R funds can provide up to 90%).

It also extends the time a state has to obligate and expend the funds for range development from two fiscal years to five fiscal years*.

Finally, the Act provides a new revenue stream for funding range development*. It will allow up to 10% of specified apportionments from the wildlife restoration account to be used for this purpose. These funds were formerly unavailable for range construction, maintenance, or expansion projects.

We encourage states to take full advantage of the increased opportunities this new law will provide for them to build or expand safe, convenient, and modern accommodations for residents and visitors to responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights.

The NRA applauds the passage of this legislation and again would like to thank President Trump for signing this important legislation into law.

*Bold letters my emphasis




© 2019 National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. This may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
11250 Waples Mill Rd. Fairfax, VA 22030 1-800-392-8683(VOTE)​
 

Timmy59

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
5,991
Reaction score
7,694
Location
Oklahoma
We encourage states to take full advantage of the increased opportunities this new law will provide for them to build or expand safe, convenient, and modern accommodations for residents and visitors to responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights.

What a wonderful thing that would be.. But I'll have to go with, I'll believe it when I see it or in the case of Missouri " show me"..
 

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,482
Reaction score
15,851
Location
Collinsville
We encourage states to take full advantage of the increased opportunities this new law will provide for them to build or expand safe, convenient, and modern accommodations for residents and visitors to responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights.

What a wonderful thing that would be.. But I'll have to go with, I'll believe it when I see it or in the case of Missouri " show me"..

Exactly. Oklahoma definitely needs to take advantage of it. Maybe some calls, emails and letters to Stitt are in order?
 

OKCHunter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
4,536
Reaction score
4,436
Location
Edmond
Exactly. Oklahoma definitely needs to take advantage of it. Maybe some calls, emails and letters to Stitt are in order?
I can't give much detail but the ODWC is already utilizing this program. Lexington and Cherokee ranges have already been completed. There are several other ranges currently in planning / design on both COE land and state land. Several existing ranges on WMA land are also being upgraded (like Lexington and Cherokee). New ranges are a year plus process to get through the federal requirements (NEPA) then final design and construction. There are two existing ranges almost ready for remodel / re-construction.
 

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,575
Reaction score
55,719
Location
NW OK
I saw this point made on another forum and something to think about. In the future(if the leftist regain control) let us hope that the .gov doesn't require all guns be stored on these ranges---like has been done elsewhere.
 

OKCHunter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
4,536
Reaction score
4,436
Location
Edmond
I saw this point made on another forum and something to think about. In the future(if the leftist regain control) let us hope that the .gov doesn't require all guns be stored on these ranges---like has been done elsewhere.
I'm guessing a SHTF scenario will occur if they tried that, especially in OK. I know I wouldn't comply and expect most gun owners in the state would not either.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom