New lightweight AR-15 project

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
Ordered an NFA poly LPK. They haven't been in stock for a while, and were only $35. The poly LPK will save just under 3oz.

Also found this Aluminum bolt carrier that would cut about 5.7oz, for $160.

https://www.rainierarms.com/shooting-innovations-ar-15-lmb-low-mass-bcg-gray/

That got me curious. So I made an Excel chart to see how light one could go using some poly parts. Sub 3.5lbs is possible. Wow!

View attachment 108841
I’m at just under 4 lbs with optic and no poly parts, well, other than the grip. Coulda saved weight with aluminum take down pins too but wanted to use more durable titanium. Also didn’t want a polymer upper or lower either. I wanted all alloy, durable, reliable gun.
 

NikatKimber

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
20,770
Reaction score
1,492
Location
Claremore
That is crazy light.. I have a hard time holding a real light gun while standing up and shooting.
Maybe it just takes more practice.
But man that is light!!!!!!

7.34 lbs is what my PSA freedom stainless 16" weighs without a magazine and with aluminum lower.
OH it also has a tasco 3-9x40 scope on it.

Yeah it would be!

I'm just aiming for under 5lbs with optic and loaded 10rd mag.

I’m at just under 4 lbs with optic and no poly parts, well, other than the grip. Coulda saved weight with aluminum take down pins too but wanted to use more durable titanium. Also didn’t want a polymer upper or lower either. I wanted all alloy, durable, reliable gun.

The cool thing is with ARs, I can build mine my way, you can build yours, and @swampratt (and everyone else) can build theirs. And there isn't *really* a wrong way. There are different levels of accuracy, reliability, longevity, cost, or whatever, but everyone can build one to whatever compromise of the factors they choose.

The best part is that as long as no one gets a stick up their butt, we can all still be friends.
 

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
Yeah it would be!

I'm just aiming for under 5lbs with optic and loaded 10rd mag.



The cool thing is with ARs, I can build mine my way, you can build yours, and @swampratt (and everyone else) can build theirs. And there isn't *really* a wrong way. There are different levels of accuracy, reliability, longevity, cost, or whatever, but everyone can build one to whatever compromise of the factors they choose.

The best part is that as long as no one gets a stick up their butt, we can all still be friends.
For sure! I was just trying to show that you can get close to 3.5 lbs even staying all alloy!! The polymer lpk’s are certainly intriguing though.
 

NikatKimber

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
20,770
Reaction score
1,492
Location
Claremore
The NFA poly LPK came in.

Weighed all the parts on my Dillon digital powder scale. I can provide a complete parts break down if anyone is interested

Total is 4.27oz for the LPK, including the 2.4oz A2 grip, but excluding a trigger guard (the NFA and most poly lowers include a molded in TG).

Without the LPK installed - I'm waiting for now since I ordered the TN Arms Co Hybrid poly lower today - and with the Vortex Venom and a loaded 10rd aluminum mag, it weighs 5lbs - 9.9oz.

Also ordered the AIM Surplus LW bcg over Black Friday.

Combining those three items, the total savings should be 8.66oz. That puts me just over 5lbs - 1oz loaded with optic!
 

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
The NFA poly LPK came in.

Weighed all the parts on my Dillon digital powder scale. I can provide a complete parts break down if anyone is interested

Total is 4.27oz for the LPK, including the 2.4oz A2 grip, but excluding a trigger guard (the NFA and most poly lowers include a molded in TG).

Without the LPK installed - I'm waiting for now since I ordered the TN Arms Co Hybrid poly lower today - and with the Vortex Venom and a loaded 10rd aluminum mag, it weighs 5lbs - 9.9oz.

Also ordered the AIM Surplus LW bcg over Black Friday.

Combining those three items, the total savings should be 8.66oz. That puts me just over 5lbs - 1oz loaded with optic!
That’s cool. Now that you have the polymer LPK in hand, what do you think of the quality and expected reliability?
 

NikatKimber

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
20,770
Reaction score
1,492
Location
Claremore
That’s cool. Now that you have the polymer LPK in hand, what do you think of the quality and expected reliability?

I was able to play with a friend's before I ordered mine (at the same time he ordered two more). Trigger is surprisingly better than expected, quality seems alright.

Assuming they went with a higher power hammer spring due to the *significantly* lower mass, I can't see a problem with ignition except for hard primers that give standard hammers grief if paired with lighter springs.

As far as the use of polymer, again assuming that the proper polymer was used; I have no issues with it here or in the lower.

Polymer is an amazing engineering material. What it lacks is the extreme strength and heat resistance of metals. What it gains is the light weight and elasticity. In the right application and when designed for the properties, polymer is superior to metal. Wear properties can be poor if not designed properly.

The only downside IMO to a poly lower is that the buffer system is a stressed functional part of the system. This has been addressed with some of newer "hybrid" poly lowers that are molded over a metal core where the buffer tube screws in that takes the eccentric load and transfers it back to the lower portion of the receiver. Otherwise, the lower receiver just holds the magazine and fire control group in relative position to the bolt carrier. The simple FCG of the AR-15 lends itself well to the properties of polymer. A bullpup or around the magazine (like pistols) design with linkages would not work as well - or would require some of the parts to be metal.

Would I want a poly AR-15 lower / lpk on a battle rifle? No. Certainly not for the lower receiver, due to the reason mentioned above. The LPK just because I haven't studied the engineering application well enough to know if the poly is a long term substitute for the original steel parts. It could very well be in the AR-15, and a cursory look at the properties of poly and the design of the parts leads me to think so. However I can't say that for sure.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom