No. If someone's going to sue, they sue. If a doctor is incompetent, a recording isn't going to absolve him.
You're missing something here. If he is incompetent, then video evidence is that much more concrete and you're not going to hire $500 an hour to litigate the case for months, or years. If he's NOT incompetent then it will clarify and provide a foundation for what was in the chart, again, mitigating significant attorney's fees.
It's just about saving time so the provider can leave at a decent hour.
That's a benefit I'm sure, but likely much further down the priority list.
But, if you're that opposed to it, pull out your phone and say, "I'll let you record me if you let me record you." Because of Hipaa, they'll likely rescind the request.
True, but I'll bet "no" works well too.