Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
New Suppressor Legislation for Hunters?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erick" data-source="post: 1699106" data-attributes="member: 11535"><p>I asked the Senator why doens't the bill open it up for all hunters. His reply was that "I wanted to narrow the focus to landowners and their rights on their property for this bill. There are many states that allow this type of hunting (even Connecticut) for all the good reasons that seem to connect on both sides of the aisle. <strong>With regard to public lands, the argument erodes into useless discussions on poaching and government control of lands</strong>. This bill addresses the need and allows hopefully for a common sense approach to the issue.</p><p></p><p>So it looks like the worry was that it couldn't get passed now (for what ever reason) if the government land was involved. Hopefully this will be a slam dunk and we can use our <em>firearm mounted hearing protection</em> while hunting on private land soon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erick, post: 1699106, member: 11535"] I asked the Senator why doens't the bill open it up for all hunters. His reply was that "I wanted to narrow the focus to landowners and their rights on their property for this bill. There are many states that allow this type of hunting (even Connecticut) for all the good reasons that seem to connect on both sides of the aisle. [B]With regard to public lands, the argument erodes into useless discussions on poaching and government control of lands[/B]. This bill addresses the need and allows hopefully for a common sense approach to the issue. So it looks like the worry was that it couldn't get passed now (for what ever reason) if the government land was involved. Hopefully this will be a slam dunk and we can use our [I]firearm mounted hearing protection[/I] while hunting on private land soon. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
New Suppressor Legislation for Hunters?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom