Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
NFA weapon used in self defense.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CAR-AR-M16" data-source="post: 940279" data-attributes="member: 204"><p>I see your point and I agree that in a justifiable shooting it should not matter what weapon was used. My problem is who decides it is justifiable. If I grab one of my MG's and in all the excitement/nervousness of the situation I do not realize it is on FA and commence to cut loose with a 30rd burst I can almost guarantee that some anti-gun DA is going to say I used excessive force. Having served on a lot of jury's in my life I have seen the way both prosecutors and defense lawyers twist and turn evidence to suit their needs and play on peoples emotions. My wife worked in the Cleveland County Court Clerks office for many years and can tell you some great stories about some of the tricks lawyers can use. I also have a friend who was a C3 Dealer in TN (I bought several of my NFA items from him) and he is a fine example to me of the fairness in todays court system. He heard a commotion outside of his house and looked out to see 5 girls beating up his daughter. He went outside with a handgun and broke up the fight and held the girls until police arrived. To make a long story short the 5 girls claimed they were doing nothing, he came out and threatened them, called them some racial names and held them against their will. Anyway today he is in prison. Some great legal system we have isn't it? Even though it was not an NFA weapon used in this incident it was brought up at trial that he dealt in machineguns and I am sure that added to the picture the prosecutor was trying to paint of him being some "gun crazy" guy just looking to kill someone. Stuff like this causes me to have no faith in the legal system protecting me in a justifible shooting. The way I see it I gain no advantge going to an NFA weapon vs. a standard rifle/pistol, but I can see the use of an NFA weapon going against me by some anti-gun DA. If you can afford it and trust the legal system and know for 100% certainty that if you ever have to use it that it will be justifible, go for it. To me it is not worth the risk or the negative publicity it gives to NFA owners and it offers me no advantage. Again, just my opinion and I respect yours as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CAR-AR-M16, post: 940279, member: 204"] I see your point and I agree that in a justifiable shooting it should not matter what weapon was used. My problem is who decides it is justifiable. If I grab one of my MG's and in all the excitement/nervousness of the situation I do not realize it is on FA and commence to cut loose with a 30rd burst I can almost guarantee that some anti-gun DA is going to say I used excessive force. Having served on a lot of jury's in my life I have seen the way both prosecutors and defense lawyers twist and turn evidence to suit their needs and play on peoples emotions. My wife worked in the Cleveland County Court Clerks office for many years and can tell you some great stories about some of the tricks lawyers can use. I also have a friend who was a C3 Dealer in TN (I bought several of my NFA items from him) and he is a fine example to me of the fairness in todays court system. He heard a commotion outside of his house and looked out to see 5 girls beating up his daughter. He went outside with a handgun and broke up the fight and held the girls until police arrived. To make a long story short the 5 girls claimed they were doing nothing, he came out and threatened them, called them some racial names and held them against their will. Anyway today he is in prison. Some great legal system we have isn't it? Even though it was not an NFA weapon used in this incident it was brought up at trial that he dealt in machineguns and I am sure that added to the picture the prosecutor was trying to paint of him being some "gun crazy" guy just looking to kill someone. Stuff like this causes me to have no faith in the legal system protecting me in a justifible shooting. The way I see it I gain no advantge going to an NFA weapon vs. a standard rifle/pistol, but I can see the use of an NFA weapon going against me by some anti-gun DA. If you can afford it and trust the legal system and know for 100% certainty that if you ever have to use it that it will be justifible, go for it. To me it is not worth the risk or the negative publicity it gives to NFA owners and it offers me no advantage. Again, just my opinion and I respect yours as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
NFA weapon used in self defense.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom